Although much work has examined the conditions for competition and incumbent defeat in high-visibility elections, scholars have conducted little research on these conditions for less visible offices. We look at one particular type of low-information election: those to state intermediate appellate courts (IAC). Using a comprehensive data set of all IAC elections involving incumbents from 2000 to 2007, we estimate models of challenger entry and incumbent suc-cess once challenged. Our results comport, in some cases, and diverge, in others, with the findings of studies of more visible judicial and legislative offices
Electoral competition has been an important subject of political science research over the past seve...
Proponents of judicial elections and related campaign activities emphasize existing First Amendment ...
Objective. This article will examine whether candidate sex impacts electoral outcomes in judicial e...
Although much work has examined the conditions for competition and incumbent defeat in high-visibili...
The subject of judicial elections has garnered an increasing amount of attention by scholars over th...
Hall notes that ballot rolloff in supreme court races is substantial but not random. Various institu...
This paper examines the strategies of challengers and the choices of voters to answer a vitally impo...
There has been much debate over changes in state supreme court elections. However, most of the resea...
Critics traditionally portray state Supreme Court elections as low-information events that fail to a...
The vast majority of judicial offices in the United States are subject to election. The votes of the...
This forthcoming book chapter defines the problem of diminished political competition, describes the...
Twenty-one states elect appellate judges, while the others use gubernatorial appointment, legislativ...
While most commentators have been focused on the outcome of key Senate races in this year’s midterm ...
In this study, I examine the effects of information on party voting in judicial elections. In any lo...
In the United States today the vast majority of states conduct elections in some form or fashion to ...
Electoral competition has been an important subject of political science research over the past seve...
Proponents of judicial elections and related campaign activities emphasize existing First Amendment ...
Objective. This article will examine whether candidate sex impacts electoral outcomes in judicial e...
Although much work has examined the conditions for competition and incumbent defeat in high-visibili...
The subject of judicial elections has garnered an increasing amount of attention by scholars over th...
Hall notes that ballot rolloff in supreme court races is substantial but not random. Various institu...
This paper examines the strategies of challengers and the choices of voters to answer a vitally impo...
There has been much debate over changes in state supreme court elections. However, most of the resea...
Critics traditionally portray state Supreme Court elections as low-information events that fail to a...
The vast majority of judicial offices in the United States are subject to election. The votes of the...
This forthcoming book chapter defines the problem of diminished political competition, describes the...
Twenty-one states elect appellate judges, while the others use gubernatorial appointment, legislativ...
While most commentators have been focused on the outcome of key Senate races in this year’s midterm ...
In this study, I examine the effects of information on party voting in judicial elections. In any lo...
In the United States today the vast majority of states conduct elections in some form or fashion to ...
Electoral competition has been an important subject of political science research over the past seve...
Proponents of judicial elections and related campaign activities emphasize existing First Amendment ...
Objective. This article will examine whether candidate sex impacts electoral outcomes in judicial e...